Understanding carbon accounting standards is more important than ever for companies striving to effectively reduce their greenhouse gas emissions.
Choosing between ISO 14064 and the GHG Protocol is far from straightforward, but this chart helps navigate the maze of questions that arise when deciding which methodology is best to adopt.
We can assess scope and flexibility based on the evaluation perimeter and the resulting needs.
Key points:
If the goal is to use a comprehensive and adaptable framework that works across all industries, ISO 14064 is the ideal solution.
For a standardised and company-focused approach, the GHG Protocol may be a better fit.
It’s important to note that the main difference is not just in operational structure:
while the GHG Protocol relies on three emission scopes, ISO defines six categories of emissions.
Moreover, ISO-compliant verification requires an independent third party, and ISO’s compatibility with other standards makes its broader application even easier.
ecosostenibile.eu® benefit company, through the eCO₂ platform, integrates all emission calculations via a dynamic dashboard—offering precise, up-to-date data and generating reports that can be certified by third-party organisations according to ISO standards.
Christian Sansoni
